• Filter by Client Type

  • Filter by Service Type

Representative Engagements

False Claims Act Lawsuit

Realtors, on behalf of the federal government, brought a False Claims Act lawsuit against one of the largest mortgage servicers, alleging they had not properly performed HAMP modifications. CrossCheck reviewed and responded to the realtors’ allegations, providing expert testimony that helped the client achieve a favorable settlement.

Client Type

Mortgage Servicer

Law Firm

Service Type

Expert Testimony


HAMP Class Action

A plaintiff brought a class action regarding HAMP modifications against one of the largest banks. Counsel engaged CrossCheck to review the mortgage servicing files. We prepared an expert report and provided deposition testimony, which resulted in denial of class certification.

 

Client Type

Large Bank ($50 billion + in assets)

Law Firm

Service Type

Expert Testimony


HAMP Expert Testimony

Counsel for a top-five bank engaged CrossCheck on several cases to review plaintiffs’ declined HAMP modifications. We prepared an expert report and provided deposition testimony, resulting in favorable settlements for the bank.

 

Client Type

Large Bank ($50 billion + in assets)

Law Firm

Service Type

Expert Testimony


Mortgage Servicing Review

One of the nation’s largest banks, serving as trustee on various mortgage-backed securities, wanted to assess the performance of the servicer of the trust’s loans. CrossCheck performed this review, allowing the trustee to have a reliable understanding of the servicer’s performance.

Client Type

Large Bank ($50 billion + in assets)

Law Firm

Litigation Support Firm

Service Type

File Review


Mortgage-backed Securities Settlement Evaluation

CrossCheck partnered with a major litigation support firm to provide an opinion as to the fairness of a proposed settlement between an RMBS issuer and various investor groups. CrossCheck supervised the review of several thousand loans sampled from multiple RMBS trusts in order to evaluate the proposed settlement amount. The work resulted in approval of the proposed settlement.

Client Type

Large Bank $50 billion +

Litigation Support Firm

Service Type

Expert Support


Predatory Lending Litigation

A borrower sued the client, a national mortgage lender, alleging that the lender engaged in predatory lending and loan flipping. CrossCheck reviewed the underwriting of the subject mortgage loan and provided expert opinions on the quality of the underwriting (including the borrower’s ability to repay), benefit to the borrower, and suitability of the type of loan. As a result, the client was able to achieve a favorable settlement of the case.

Client Type

Mortgage Banker

Law Firm

Service Type

Expert Testimony


RMBS Investor Litigation

Mortgage-backed securities investors, including government-sponsored enterprises regulated by FHFA, have filed actions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and various state investment acts. Defendants’ counsel has retained CrossCheck to provide loan file review and expert testimony on many of these cases. We review the mortgage loan files underlying the security to evaluate the original underwriting and due diligence process. We determine the consistency of the loan portfolio’s attributes with security offering documents. CrossCheck has utilized its experience with loan products and underwriting standards to provide evaluations relevant to the historical context in which the loans were originated. Our work has culminated in expert reports, deposition testimony, and trial testimony.

Client Type

Large Bank ($50 Billion + in assets)

Law Firm

Litigation Support Firm

Service Type

Expert Testimony